| Anonymous | Login | Signup for a new account | May 21, 2013 12:32 am |  |
| Main | My View | View Issues | Vote Tallies | FAQ |
| View Issue Details [ Jump to Notes ] | [ Issue History ] [ Print ] | ||||||||
| ID | Project | Category | Date Submitted | Last Update | |||||
| 0000366 | AI War | Suggestion - Balance Tweaks | Oct 8, 2010 7:45 pm | Oct 8, 2010 7:51 pm | |||||
| Reporter | Winter Born | ||||||||
| Assigned To | x4000 | ||||||||
| Severity | minor | ||||||||
| Status | closed | Resolution | no change required | ||||||
| Product Version | 3.703 | ||||||||
| Fixed in Version | |||||||||
| Summary | 0000366: V3 Lightning warheads range seems tiny | ||||||||
| Description | V3 lightning warhead has a range of 250 V2 1000 V1 1500 Is this intentional? A range of 250 is going to require pixel perfect placement. :0 | ||||||||
| Tags | No tags attached. | ||||||||
| Internal Weight | |||||||||
| Attached Files | |||||||||
 Relationships |
|
 Relationships |
|
Notes |
|
|
(0000548) x4000 (administrator) Oct 8, 2010 7:51 pm |
Indeed that's pretty much the idea. It has to reach it's specific target, and the collateral damage is pretty miniscule. |
|
Notes |
|
This issue is already marked as resolved. If you feel that is not the case, please reopen it and explain why. |
|
| Supporters: | No one explicitly supports this issue yet. |
| Opponents: | No one explicitly opposes this issue yet. |
|
Issue History |
|||
| Date Modified | Username | Field | Change |
| Oct 8, 2010 7:45 pm | Winter Born | New Issue | |
| Oct 8, 2010 7:51 pm | x4000 | Note Added: 0000548 | |
| Oct 8, 2010 7:51 pm | x4000 | Status | new => closed |
| Oct 8, 2010 7:51 pm | x4000 | Assigned To | => x4000 |
| Oct 8, 2010 7:51 pm | x4000 | Resolution | open => no change required |
|
Issue History |
| Copyright © 2000 - 2011 MantisBT Group |
 |