0006892: If using advanced start, give a handful of enchantments

View Issue Details [ Jump to Notes ]

[ Issue History ] [ Print ]

Project

Category

Date Submitted

Last Update

0006892

AVWW

[All Projects] Suggestion - Gameplay

Mar 27, 2012 6:21 am

Apr 9, 2012 3:11 pm

Reporter

Toll

Assigned To

keith.lamothe

Severity

minor

Status

resolved

Resolution

fixed

Product Version

0.916

Fixed in Version

Summary

0006892: If using advanced start, give a handful of enchantments

Description

Right now, when you're using advanced start (i.e. starting on the second continent), you start off with no enchantments at all. Giving ten (or any other number) random enchantments would at least give experienced players a bit more of a boost when facing the second continent; right now, it's a very huge difference going from an established world to a new world (which, granted, it should be; no enchantments at all is a bit rough though).

As a comparison, you start out with ten unlocks already completed (the "Complete x missions" unlocks), so the enchantments could very well go into the same category as "something you would've gotten on continent 1".

Tags

No tags attached.

Internal Weight

Feature Suggestion

Attached Files

Relationships

Notes
(0021492) khadgar (reporter) Mar 28, 2012 1:25 pm	I vote for (at least) all the enchants given in the tutorial mission. I seem to recall getting 100% falling damage immunity enchant every tutorial, though that could have been a fluke.

(0021880) keith.lamothe (administrator) Apr 9, 2012 3:11 pm	For 0.926: * In an expert-start game the first settlement now has 10 "catchup enchant containers" seeded in it which each give an enchant to a player picking them up; they don't grant enchant points and can be picked up once per player, kind of like the rare-enchant-containers dropped by lieutenants or overlords. Thanks :)

**Issue Community Support**
This issue is already marked as resolved. If you feel that is not the case, please reopen it and explain why.
Supporters:	No one explicitly supports this issue yet.
Opponents:	No one explicitly opposes this issue yet.

Issue History
Date Modified	Username	Field	Change
Mar 27, 2012 6:21 am	Toll	New Issue
Mar 27, 2012 4:14 pm	tigersfan	Internal Weight	=> Feature Suggestion
Mar 27, 2012 4:14 pm	tigersfan	Status	new => considering
Mar 28, 2012 1:25 pm	khadgar	Note Added: 0021492
Apr 9, 2012 3:11 pm	keith.lamothe	Note Added: 0021880
Apr 9, 2012 3:11 pm	keith.lamothe	Status	considering => resolved
Apr 9, 2012 3:11 pm	keith.lamothe	Resolution	open => fixed
Apr 9, 2012 3:11 pm	keith.lamothe	Assigned To	=> keith.lamothe